Sarah Palin and the media circus that surrounds her most definitely qualifies as a conundrum. It’s as American as say, journalists and soldiers “could and should be”… or something like that.
After reading every word of her 432-page book and viewing the scores of TV interviews coinciding with the Going Rogue media tour (a media tour by PLANE, not bus) I too am left wondering about the millions of other worthy news items pushed to the B and C rolls or no roll at all. [Just an interesting aside: I first learned about all this B and C roll stuff while an exchange student at Fisk University in Nashville, TN - Al Gore was the lecturer of a class aimed at exposing the art of media filtering.]
And so goes the tabloid summary. On one hand, we have a political figure with the gift for gab and an assumed “chip” on her shoulder. On the other, we have a media presumably fascinated by a modern and spunky Molly Brown-type who walks around Manhatten with a handmade hand bag made of moose fur.
Sarah Palin is a conundrum but the media industry’s obsession with her makes a lot of sense. In many ways, the Palin saga is symptomatic of a media industry continuing its struggle to find a place in an environment of tough bottom lines and rapidly emerging technologies. A united front of media execs have articulated through their endless coverage of Sarah Palin that short-term gains continue to dominate editorial decision-making (even NYT’s Maureen Dowd gets this).
Sarah Palin’s “B Team” appears to be more than just simply aware of this reality as they continue to successfully execute what is perhaps one of the best new media rapid response programs developed to-date. For all those new to Grassroots communications, I trade you one Ben Hurr for one million bloggers in their parents’ basements.
Sarah Palin’s Facebook following has reached a total of 1,088,260 supporters and counting. What makes this statistic so unique is that unlike the one-timer who flocks to a Macy’s fan page after seeing a 25% discount advertisement in their “Sponsor” widget, these Facebookers are emotionally engaged brand evangelists with guns cocked and targets eyed. Their route to her FB page is a journey filled with one headline after the next. If Sarah Palin’s position is to call ‘em like she sees ‘em, she is gettin’ all the help she needs from her supporters THANKS to all those Media Elite Liberals (MELS).
What other explanation is there for why she continues to remain a top trending topic one year after the election despite stepping down from the Alaska governorship.
By issuing a reaction to every wacky headline and publishing a Media Maverick’s Iliad, Sarah Palin and her Ice Pick warriors have created a second Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) all the way to Rockefeller Plaza, putting money back into the pockets of (at least) one Alaskan. Sarah Palin’s public relations nightmare is now the media’s problem and her lifeboat: despite being among the ranks of the currently ‘not seeking’, she remains alive and very relevant. While her base is motivated and engaged, it is also growing in influence, creating residual coverage by the download and helping to call out the proverbial bully on Sarah’s playground.
I’m rubber, you’re glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!
One even begins to wonder if the ‘falafel lady’ and the girl from Homer are really no more than soldiers of Palin’s own battalion, not the Rahm-It-Through brigade as Going Rogue suggests? Nah, couldn’t be.
Has the ongoing coverage of Sarah Palin, whom many in the media call irrelevant (Sorry Stephen Power, Manajordan made me do it!), been too excessive? Yes.
(See manajordan’s comment posted on WSJ’s WashWire blog at 7:25pm, December 6th)
“More and more the Lame Stream Media is relying on people to do little more than read the headline. More and more people are realizing they have to do their own research in order to find out the facts. The LSM has little to no idea they are the ones making themselves irrelevant. The media is supposed to be the watchdog. Instead they’ve become the water carriers for the team they love best. Journalism is dead. WSJ ‘journalists’, you are embarrassing yourselves…please stop it.”
Has she, unlike any major national political candidate who preceded her, received unfair treatment by media outlets? Perhaps.
Is she ill-refined or ill-defined? Depends on who you ask.
…Does it matter? Yes. No. And maybe.
Will she run for President in 2012? Not sure why Oprah, Barbara, Hannity, O’Reilly and friends couldn’t figure that one out. After all, they had a hand in creating her.

